Guardian Slammed For Dramatic Reaction To Trump Victory

The Guardian has faced backlash for what many see as an exaggerated response to President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. In an email to staff, editor Katharine Viner called the election result “very upsetting” and laid out a series of mental health support measures for employees, including counseling and virtual wellbeing tools.

Viner’s email struck a dire tone, claiming Trump’s win “could reverberate for a million years” and encouraging international staff to check in on their American colleagues. British employees were given access to mental health services and online doctors, while U.S. and Australian staff were offered counseling programs, sparking criticism that the measures were over-the-top.

Critics have mocked the Guardian for its dramatic language and perceived inability to handle political developments professionally. While election results often prompt strong reactions, the provision of formal counseling services has led many to question the publication’s focus and resilience.

Adding to the controversy, the Guardian used Trump’s win to solicit donations, claiming that “independent journalism” is needed to challenge his administration. This fundraising push echoes previous efforts, such as the newspaper’s campaign supporting Kamala Harris in 2020, during which it raised $2 million.

The Guardian’s reaction has been widely criticized as emblematic of the increasing detachment of some media outlets from their audiences. Critics argue that offering counseling for election results diminishes the seriousness of journalism and raises concerns about the publication’s priorities.

For a news outlet that prides itself on holding power to account, the Guardian’s reaction to Trump’s win has drawn scrutiny. Critics contend that the publication needs to shift its focus from internal dramatics to providing the balanced, credible reporting that readers expect.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR