State Department Draws Criticism For Hosting Therapy Sessions Post-Election

Secretary of State Antony Blinken has come under fire for using federal funds to host therapy sessions for employees upset over President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. Reports revealed that these sessions, described by insiders as “cry sessions,” were organized to help staff cope with Vice President Kamala Harris’ defeat.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) condemned the sessions in a letter to Blinken, questioning the use of taxpayer money for what he called partisan grievances. “The Department has no obligation to cater to employees distressed by the results of a free and fair election,” Issa wrote, emphasizing the importance of maintaining professionalism within government agencies.

The State Department reportedly sent an internal email advertising the sessions as stress management resources during “challenging times.” Issa argued that this raises serious questions about the Department’s ability to implement President-elect Trump’s policy agenda effectively. He suggested that employees unwilling to support the administration’s priorities should consider stepping down.

Issa demanded a detailed account of the sessions, including their costs, frequency, and purpose. He also expressed concern over the precedent set by the Department in using public funds to accommodate political disappointment, calling it a misuse of resources intended for national interests.

The backlash from conservatives highlights broader concerns about partisanship within federal agencies. Many argue that such actions undermine public trust and reflect poorly on the ability of government institutions to remain nonpartisan during political transitions.

This controversy has reignited calls for stricter oversight of federal spending to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. Critics of the State Department’s actions see this incident as part of a larger pattern of partisanship in government agencies.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR