A quiet order from President Trump has now forced the intelligence community to admit that more than 120 U.S.-funded biolabs span the globe, including over 40 in war‑torn Ukraine, and most Americans were never told they existed.
Story Snapshot
- Former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard ordered a review of 120+ overseas U.S.-funded biolabs in 30+ countries.[1][3]
- More than 40 of those labs are reportedly in Ukraine, sitting in an active war zone with Russia.[1][3]
- The labs tie back to U.S. Defense Department threat‑reduction programs and biosecurity spending dating back years.[1][3][5]
- Officials insist the work is “peaceful,” but they have not released a lab‑by‑lab inventory of pathogens, funding, or safety records.[1][3][5]
Trump Orders Full Intel Review Of U.S.-Funded Biolabs Overseas
President Donald Trump directed Former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to lead a full review of biological laboratories overseas that receive American money.[1][3] According to reporting on the order, the U.S. intelligence community must inspect research at every U.S.-funded biotech lab abroad, covering more than 120 facilities across over 30 countries.[1][3] These labs include sites that handle viruses and other dangerous pathogens, some tied to past programs aimed at dealing with weapons of mass destruction after the Cold War.[1]
Reports say this review will map where each lab is located, which pathogens they hold, and what kind of experiments are underway.[1] Gabbard’s office framed the mission as stopping “dangerous experiments,” including any work that may increase risks to public health.[1] Separate coverage notes that the U.S. Department of Defense has poured an estimated $1.4 billion into overseas pathogen research between 2014 and 2023.[3] That level of spending shows that this is not a small side project, but a large, long‑running global program.[3]
Ukraine Biolabs: From “Conspiracy Theory” To Official Scrutiny
Media and political figures spent years dismissing talk of U.S.-linked biolabs in Ukraine as a “conspiracy,” yet official sources now acknowledge extensive activity there.[5][6] A fact sheet from the U.S. Department of Defense, cited in later reporting, states the United States invested about $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.[5] Gabbard’s office now says more than 40 of the biolabs under current review are in Ukraine and could be “at risk of compromise” due to the war with Russia.[1][3]
Back in 2022, Gabbard warned that U.S.-supported labs in Ukraine held dangerous pathogens that could escape if sites were hit or seized in combat.[4][6] She stressed she was not claiming the labs were making bioweapons, but that they contained risky agents in a war zone.[5][6] At the same time, State Department official Victoria Nuland told the Senate that Ukraine had “biological research facilities” and that Washington was worried Russian forces might gain control of them.[4][6] Those statements now sit uncomfortably beside years of blanket denials from some commentators.[5][6]
What We Know – And Still Do Not Know – About These Biolabs
U.S. officials describe many of these projects as part of the Defense Department’s Joint Threat Reduction Program, which is said to study pathogens to prevent outbreaks and strengthen U.S. biosecurity.[1] A joint statement from the United States and several partner countries, including Ukraine, insists the work is “open and transparent” and “exclusively peaceful.”[5] They also stress that these labs are owned and run by host nations, not by Washington directly, and are publicly listed rather than secret bases.[5]
Yet even with those assurances, basic details remain hidden from the public record. The available reporting does not show a lab‑by‑lab list of facilities, their exact U.S. funding streams, or their current research protocols.[1][3][5] The review is also being described as a way to find out whether any risky virus experiments, such as those that might increase transmissibility or severity, took place.[1][3] So far, no public evidence confirms that these labs carried out covert gain‑of‑function work, but the government has not released the data that would settle the question.[1][3][5]
Why Conservative Voters Care About Hidden Biolabs And Secret Spending
For many Americans, this story hits several long‑running concerns at once: secrecy, globalism, and unaccountable spending of taxpayer dollars. The United States has quietly funded overseas biological research for decades, including in unstable or hostile regions, with very little open debate at home.[1][3][5] When questions were raised about Ukrainian labs in 2022, some critics were mocked or labeled as pushing foreign propaganda, even as officials admitted those labs existed and held dangerous pathogens.[5][6]
Grok Analysis:
✅DNI Tulsi Gabbard announced today the declassification of intelligence showing past US funding for over 120 biolabs in more than 30 countries, including Ukraine, matching numbers from her office’s May 2026 review.
✅These facilities were supported via the… https://t.co/9phAmpY6E7
— Charissa McSwain (@CharissaMcSwain) June 12, 2026
Now, with Trump back in the White House and Gabbard at the top of the intelligence community, this review forces the bureaucracy to put facts on the table. It raises basic questions many conservatives have asked for years: Who approved these projects? What exactly are foreign labs doing with American money? Are any experiments increasing risk instead of reducing it? And why were citizens kept in the dark until a political fight made disclosure unavoidable?[1][3][5] Those answers will decide whether this program protects Americans—or quietly endangers them.
Sources:
[1] Web – DNI Tulsi Gabbard Exposes 120+ US-Funded Biolabs Worldwide
[3] X – 40 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine to be investigated Tulsi Gabbard is …
[4] Web – US intelligence audits global funding of overseas bio labs amid …
[5] YouTube – Tulsi Gabbard to PROBE BIOLABS
[6] Web – Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory – Wikipedia
